Advertise Here

Frame

Read all editions of Habitat

Abeokutaasaba.png

Build-to-Rent (BTR) in Secondary Cities: Why Abeokuta and Asaba Offer Surprising Rental Yields

When people talk about Nigeria’s rental market, it is usually through Lagos. That focus makes sense, but it’s becoming less and less adequate. In addition, burgeoning tenant demand and rents that do not fall in proportion to development costs make cities such as Abeokuta and Asaba a more attractive proposition for build-to-rent (BTR) investors with lower land costs.

BTR is a purpose-built rental. The owner retains the building, manages it professionally and earns recurrent income from rents.

The UN estimates that Nigeria’s urban population will grow from about half the country’s population today to around 70% by 2050. Much of that growth will be in secondary cities, where the housing supply is fragmented, poorly managed and mismatched to the needs of salaried workers, students and moving professionals.

Abeokuta has a particularly good case. Ogun State, situated in the economic shadow of Lagos, has become one of Nigeria’s major industrial and residential growth corridors. Abeokuta is about 80 kilometers from Lagos and has a passenger station on the Lagos-Ibadan rail corridor. The city also benefits from its status as the state capital and spillover demand as housing costs rise in Lagos.

The opportunity for developers is not to reproduce a Lagos luxury scheme. It is for the provision of secure and well-managed one- and two-bedroom apartments with assured water, power solutions, parking and transparent service charges. Those features could be a premium in a market where many tenants are currently renting from small landlords with inconsistent maintenance standards.

An equally interesting, but different, proposition is Asaba. The capital of Delta State is on the other side of the Niger River from Onitsha, one of the largest commercial centers in south-eastern Nigeria.

The yield potential is the difference between the acquisition cost and what rent can be achieved. A project with a cost of ₦35 million per apartment and an annual rental of ₦3.6 million would yield a gross yield of about 10.3 per cent.

This is not a market-wide promise, it is a development target before vacancy, repairs, management, taxes, financing and service charge leakage. Net returns can be materially lower.

The risks are equally real. Title defects, inflation, construction-cost volatility, weak infrastructure and limited resale liquidity can destroy an attractive spreadsheet. Demand must be tested street by street, not inferred from a city’s population.

Abeokuta and Asaba are not automatic high-yield markets. They are execution markets.